SLAPP and ROB
Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation Condominium Homeowner Association
Lies and Deceit.
Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation Condominium Homeowner Association
Lies and Deceit.
This is my HOA hearing in 2014 defending myself against a claim of vendor interference. Bill fined me $250 with no vendor present. He didn't like my reporting damage on Twitter at @OccupyHOA and now @SlapRob.
His alleged financial fraud is shown in the first statement showing Bill Cook selling his 2 units without paying the HOA almost $10,000 of interest. This is why he attacked me with false claims when he was president of the board.
SLAPPandROB.com is a journal recording Country Club Condominiums Homeowners Association (HOA) behavior over the last 12 years and a memoir of some of the life of Thomas Scott Burns (SQGuru). Formerly known as ShieldsUp.com since 1995. That Domain has been sold and a few others are for sale such as QGallery.com, CloakQ.com and ProfitAbleTrust.com. My 2 Twitter Id's are @OccupyHOA and @SlapRob.
Never a late payment 29 years,
usually paying early in the middle of the month.
Payment for December 1st 2022 due date was mailed November 8th. CMI has consistently errored posting payments since January 2021.
I photographed all payments with the dated coupons as proof. Still CMI incorrectly posted to the account.
Never a late payment 29 years.
The CMI December 22nd 2022 statement for January 1st 2023 was current with $379.88 due and no late fees.
CMI ledger errors caused $360 payment for December 2022 to remain on the balance due. It was paid in November.
Never a late payment 29 years.
Confirmations for all 2023 payments show paid on time using the CMI website ClickPay link.
This is allegedly extortion by CMI retaliating against Cherie for trying to be elected onto the board of directors.
The Proxy has been used again by CMI and all the previous property management companies.
Never a late payment 29 years.
My small claims Case C147740SC Judge says I have a constitution case of discrimination to possibly pursue against Bill Cook who is president of the Country Club Condominiums Homeowners Association. I am trying to afford an attorney to represent me. It is the fifth year of personal abuse. The By Laws, Oregon law and State Statutes have been violated and continue to be broken by this person. I am a victim. Forensic fingerprint evidence processed inconclusive for Washington County criminal case.
The natural beauty is gone. The landscape once seeming untouched by humans is no more. A fire of ignorance and a lack of sophistication has destroyed what was so special. Like a bad haircut the plants suffer from severe shearing as a pinhead crewcut instead of a sculpted layering. All just to provoke a response as the form of entrapment. Fined $250 for vendor interference that never happened, only commented on Twitter @OccupyHOA journaling the alleged destruction caused by Astoria Oregon politicians Bill Cook and Carol Gearin. Landscape committee Barbara Madsen allegedly committed perjury for them, saying the same lie over and over again for almost a decade. Ten fines for reporting the news on Twitter. You can get arrested for filing a false police report, but you get away with it as a Homeowner Association board member. SLAPPandROB.com and @SlapRob
Allegedly, Attorney Michael Vial knowingly defended former and current presidents and members of the Country Club Condominiums Homeowners Association and former and current property management companies and employees against claims by former and present Owners of the financial fraud.
My complaint is being filed at the Department of Justice and again the FBI with the intent of starting a Federal Criminal Investigation into the continued fraudulent activity involving Mortgage fraud.
John Hatch who was the former HOA president and again current board member allegedly facilitated the financial fraud when he bought former president Bill Cook’s unit and was instantly appointed as president of the HOA by the board of directors at the time and Susan West of BPM management.
I was instrumental in Eric Houg being elected to the board in 2019 that caused John Hatch and most of the board to resign and attorney Michael Vial fired. Eric Houg and two other homeowners partially won a case alleging the financial fraud in 2018.
A copy of the DOJ complaint will follow after filed.
John Hatch quote: “Remember, Vial Fotheringham doesn't get paid to win cases. They get paid by getting us into lawsuits, win or lose.”
The arbitrator was biased and errored. Settlement was for me to move away immediately, before 2 22 2022. I would not and paid attorney's $23,000 trying to get $16,670 back. John Hatch knew not to pay the special assessment and also knew Bill Cook was getting away without paying his obligation to pay $9,900 of interest and the special assessment.
4 28 2021
After all of Carol Gearin grandstanding before MY Special Meeting Keynote Presentation that I called into order, she walks up to my face as I tried to speak and blocked me from proceeding as Mary went over and unplugged my computer and TV that showed the details of negligence and financial fraud issues. I took my equipment home as they ramrodded their lies to everyone there causing me great harm and suffering. I should have stayed and overpowered them instead.
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
Fined $250 for vendor interference that never happened, only commented on Twitter @OccupyHOA journaling the alleged destruction caused by Astoria Oregon politicians Bill Cook and Carol Gearin. Landscape committee Barbara Madsen allegedly committed perjury for them, saying the same lie over and over again for almost a decade. Filing a false police report is illegal. SLAPPandROB.com and @SlapRob
Allegedly property management companies and law firm are operating in multiple states that are consistently charging additional monthly dues at the closing of a Condominium sale.
My condo unit sold and closed on April 19, 2019. The property management company included May dues of $300 in the Resale Demand document.
The new owner, the Title company, the property management company and HOA board of directors will not return the $300 for May dues.
The property management company also charged extra months of monthly dues on two other units sold in 2021.
I was overcharged $1,500 at closing November 2010 when I bought the unit 28 foreclosure.
The HOA Homeowners Association Board Of Directors has already sued BPM property management December 5, 2019 for special assessment fraud and won, Washington County Case 19CV52494.
The president and members of the board resigned and the law firm Vial Fotheringham was fired in 2019.
In 2021, both the former president of the HOA and Vial Fotheringham returned to power and allegedly continued the financial fraud to this date.
I have lost $300,000 of my retirement defending myself in court from retaliation because I was instrumental in exposing the criminal financial activity since 2010 and had a board member arrested and convicted in 2014.
The Washington County Oregon civil judicial errors are appalling.
Perjury is what changes this case to a Federal criminal case from a civil matter.
Financial harassment and emotional distress allegedly are being used to intimidate those who sued the property management company.
Allegedly the property management company is harassing owners by sending incorrect late payment demands and charging $45 late payment fees.
In retaliation for this complaint, the property management company is allegedly destroying common area landscape property located next to particular units without cause.
It is time for a federal criminal case as the alleged criminally organized financial fraud continues across many states.
From: Eric Houg
Date: July 26, 2022 at 5:57:58 PM PDT
To:
Subject: The Board now takes the position that the special assessment was too long ago to finish collecting
Country Club Condo HOA prematurely stopped collecting special assessments on May 1, 2020, even though 12 homeowners had 5 months of remaining payments scheduled through Sept. 1, 2020. The HOA needs to fix this mistake. May 1, 2020 was the date that Blue Mountain Community Management started. I was the HOA treasurer that day, but I couldn't see if they were collecting special assessments, because the HOA wouldn't let me see the accounting for individual owners. Every time the HOA has screwed up the collection of special assessments, it can be traced to lack of transparency. Sydney Castilla of Blue Mountain BMC, July 28, 2020, didn't understand why would the Board need to see Blue Mountain's accounting of the owners’ payments. She wrote "We do not provide a list to any of our Associations for any account that is not delinquent." Actually, owners were delinquent on their special assessments, but BMC didn't provide that list / accounting. I blame the rest of the Board too, for their tacit approval of do-nothing, by not backing me up that we need to see the complete accounting. The HOA will fight hard against complying with its own Bylaws Article VI Section 7, as well as ORS100.480 (9), both of which give any member of the HOA the right to examine the HOA accounting of receipts (income) and expenditures, with, no exception for the income from owners, which are 100% of the HOA's income.
The HOA agreed, in an out-of-court settlement dated July 26, 2018, admit to their error, and to collect the special assessments from the owners as of Sept. 1, 2009, who still owed and owned. I obtained Blue Mountain Community Management's accounting for individual owners at the end of March 2022, for the 9-month period from May 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021, the full duration of BMC's management with CCC HOA. On June 1, 2022, I dropped in on the board's Zoom meeting, where the board gave tacit approval for Denise Bower of CMI to get rid of me. Denise's points were that I am no longer an owner, so the HOA does not have to deal with me, including comply with the settlement agreement regarding collecting special assessments. Denise said if I had anything I wanted to say, I should get a lawyer to present it to the HOA. Denise did not have any legal basis for her rules. (Part of the management company's job is to run interference to protect the board from those pesky homeowners who want to see the accounting or whatever.) The Board now takes the position that the special assessment was too long ago to finish collecting, and the directors weren't even around in 2009 when the special assessment was assessed. I don't agree with those arguments, because...
The settlement agreement (a contract) is with Eric Houg, among others, not with the owner of any particular condo.
The agreement was signed for the HOA by John Hatch, who is still a director.
Melody Boyce is a director. She experienced the special assessment. Her family is an original owner since 1979.
The agreement is with Country Club Condominium HOA, not with any particular director.
Do the right thing, the fair thing.
Just like before the July 2018 settlement, the HOA is covering up the problem of not finishing the collections. In general, HOAs seem incapable of correctly collecting a special assessment. Next time a director says "If we were to spent money on that, we would have to have a special assessment", you can reply "Why don't you first finish collecting the special assessment the HOA already assessed?" The average director has personally benefited more the average owner in how much special assessment money they tried to, or did, escape paying. Escape means sell their condo before the accounting errors are corrected.
The amount of failed-to-collect special assessment in 2018 was around $200,000. How much remaining money are we talking about in 2022? The amount that Blue Mountain BMC failed to account for in their 9 months ending January 31, 2021, was $11,384.55. Additional interest charges would also apply to bring the accounts up to date. Three of the 12 owners had continued to pay off their special assessments, but Blue Mountain BMC's accounting did not indicate there were any special assessments to pay, so those owners would incorrectly have a surplus showing in their accounts to this day. It is likely that those 3 owners would ultimately acquiesce and accept the HOA's incorrect accounting, effectively unpaying their final 5 months of payment. But I don't know what really happened after January 31, 2021.
Loss from owners' unpaid assessments as of January 31, 2021: $7,979.13 Current loss (before new interest charges) from all 12 owners' assessments assuming owners who paid off, ultimately unpaid, gave up fighting the management company's accounting and let their account balances zero out: $11,384.55
Back in the Summer of 2020, the owners of #41, 42, 51, and 60 each asked me what to do about their special assessment payments that Blue Mountain BMC was not accounting for. I told them all to continue making their payments through Sept. 1, 2020. #41, 42, and 51 followed my advice. #60 did not. Owner #52, Dan Armstrong, who tops the list above at $1,256.05, was the board president in 2009 when they approved the special assessment. Then in January 2010, he swapped officer duties with Treasurer Don Jones. Dan, Don, and Bill Cook had all served both as treasurer and president, Don and Bill each had held both positions simultaneously. Bill Cook had criticized Don Jones for being both president and treasurer simultaneously, but then Bill Cook did the same thing as soon as possible.
Bill Cook on the left says, but Bill Cook on the right says, May 26, 2011 emergency board meeting, 0:14:18
"You won't see me as president acting as treasurer. There will be some objectivity on this board and some accountability, so there will be more than one set of eyes on the documents."October 18, 2011 board meeting, 2:24:18
"For the time being I'm gonna go ahead and continue to act as treasurer."
Meeting Minutes:
October 14, 2011 President Bill Cook standing in as Treasurer.
November 8, 2011 Treasurer Report: Presented by Bill Cook
December 13, 2011 Treasurer report: Presented by Bill Cook
January 16, 2012 President report: Bill Cook reported that budget and reserve study on track.
February 15, 2012 Treasurer report: presented by Bill Cook
The Cooks and the Joneses escaped shortly before the HOA would correct its accounting and start collecting special assessment interest. They sold their condos within days of each other
Owner
Date of Sale
Don Jones April 30, 2018
Bill Cook May 4, 2018
Unpaid balances as of September 30, 2018
Don Jones April 30, 20185 $5,154.77
Bill Cook May 4, 2018 $9,901.77 (Nearly double the Jones amount because the Cooks had owned a second condo up until March 13, 2015.)
DATED January 8, 2018
THOMAS SCOTT BURNS, an individual resident of Oregon Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTRY CLUB CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Defendant.
Case No. 17CV46333
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
Claim for Relief $160,000.00(Defamation, Abuse of Process, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
Filing fee: $560.00
Fee Authority: ORS 21.135 NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY ARBITRATION
JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff unit owner Thomas Scott Burns (“Burns”) hereby alleges as follows:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. Country Club Condominiums consists of 60 residential units, general common elements, and limited common elements created pursuant to the provisions of the Oregon Condominium Act, ORS Chapter 100, located in Washington County, Oregon.
2. Defendant is Country Club Homeowners Association (hereinafter “The Association”), an Oregon mutual-benefit nonprofit corporation governed by its Board of Directors who’s decisions and actions are that of the defendant.
3. Burns filed a small claims case 17SC41325 on September 21, 2017 that was served on September 25, 2017. The Association responded with a request for jury trial that moved the case to civil court. Burns thus filed a complaint on October 20, 2017. Burns had requested a jury trial in a previous action, but was denied while The Association wanted a bench trail. The reasoning behind The Association requesting a jury trial is illogical to Burns. The Association has imposed excessive financial burden by pursuing a SLAPP lawsuit before, Case C154640CV. This Strategic Lawsuit At Public Participation was meant to silence Burns, and violated Burns First Amendment rights, and the Speak Free Act of 2015.
4. Burns has been blocked from becoming a homeowner association board member and a member of the landscape committee since 2011 even though Burns had extensive experience as a professional landscape maintenance company owner, a tree and shrub pesticide and disease control technician and an employee of Home Depot in the gardening department. Burns had been self employed all his life until 1990 when Burns became an investment banker. Burns understands fiduciary responsibility and due diligence working in the financial services field. Burns later became a financial journalist on the internet in 1995 as ShieldsUp.com. Burns retired in 2014.
5. The Association has intentionally acted in an arbitrary, capricious, disparate and discriminatory manner violating Resolution 12 of The Association Bylaws.
6. The Association discriminatory retaliation against Burns is an abuse of discretion and power violating Resolution 12 of The Association Bylaws that states: WHEREAS, the Board is required to perform its fiduciary duty to the Association by implementing a special assessment or obtaining a loan when it is determined to be necessary or prudent. In the context of a condominium the term “fiduciary duty” broadly means the duty to act fairly and reasonably in all actions affecting condominium owners. Accordingly, associations and their directors cannot act in an arbitrary and capricious manner toward individual condominium owners nor can they single out certain owners for disparate or discriminatory treatment. The “fiduciary duty” also requires that associations and their directors must operate the business and financial affairs of the Association with ordinary care, skill and prudence.
7. The Association has intentionally acted illegally pursuant Article 1, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution that prohibits the granting of privileges to any class of citizens which are not available on the same terms equally to all citizens.
8. The Association knowingly breaching of its legal duty that is imposed by Oregon Constitutional law and duty arising from contract or quasi-contract has resulted in injury to Burns for which the law provides a civil right of action for damages and protective remedy.
9. The Association intentional deceit and negligent misrepresentation in communicating factual information has caused extensive economic losses and severe mental and emotional distress and injury to Burns.
10. By abusing its power and illegally and discriminatorily retaliating againstBurns, The Association intended to inflict severe mental or emotional distress on Burns and knew that distress was certain and substantially certain to result from The Association conduct.
11. The Association’s acts have in fact caused Burns to suffer severe mental and emotional distress such as stress, anxiety, dread, depression, nervousness, irritability, anger, rage, sorrow, grief and a profound sense of loss.
12. The Association’s acts consist of extraordinary transgressions of the bounds of socially tolerable conduct and exceed any reasonable limit of social toleration.
13. When The Association issued to all of the unit owners the written draft minutes of its September 16, 2014 meeting of its board of directors, The Association published false and defamatory statements about Burns.
14. The Association refused to correct or retract the statements when requested by Burns.
15. In so doing, The Association libeled Burns.
16. When The Association issued to all of the unit owners the written board memo September 28, 2017 from board of directors president Don Jones, The Association published false and defamatory statements about Burns
.17. The Association refused to correct or retract the statements when requested by Burns.
18. In so doing, The Association libeled Burns.
19. When The Association issued to all of the unit owners the written newsletter from former board of directors member and former president Bill Cook December 28, 2016 that was approved by then president Don Jones of the board of directors, The Association published bias and prejudice statements affecting Burns prior to the annual elections. The private USPS mailing was at the expense of the homeowners association and not non-board member Bill Cook.
20. In so doing, The Association used funds inappropriately for a personal benefit.
21. The Association, BPM Management and current president Don Jones continue to defame Burns by writing false information about legal proceedings with the intent to inflict severe mental and emotional harm to Burns.
22. Pursuant to Article IV, Section 23 of the Bylaws requires strict compliance by the unit owners with the provisions of the Declaration, Bylaws and rules, yet The Association, committee members and owners repeatedly violate these provisions.
23. Pursuant to ORS 100.480(9)(a) association records in general should be available to homeowners.
24. Pursuant to Bylaws Article VI, Section 7 and ORS 100.480(2) full detailed accounting should be available to homeowners.
25. Pursuant to ORS 65, ORS 100, ORS 100.480(9)(a), ORS 100.480(1), and ORS 100.210(5)(o) a unit owner may obtain owners list with addresses, telephone numbers and email upon written request. The Association denies access to an owners list intentionally to dominate communication and control advocacy.
26. Pursuant to ORS 100.420 telephone calls and email regarding The Association matters sent between and among directors are subject to the same open meeting requirements as in-person gatherings. Advanced notice must be given to homeowners about the meeting and a means must be provided for owners to electronically monitor an electronic meeting.
27. Pursuant to ORS 65.354(3), and ORS 100.420 committees are subject to the same rules of transparency that apply to the board of directors, governing meetings, action without meetings, notice and waiver of notice, and quorum and voting requirements. The Association restricts and controls communications with prejudice to deter any advocacy. Burns has experienced great harm and suffering as a result of the lack of communication and transparency without prejudice.
28. The Association, BPM Management and former president Carol Gearin continued to defame Burns by writing false information about legal proceedings with the intent to inflict severe mental and emotional distress of grief, loss, sorrow, depression, stress, anxiety, heartbreak to Burns.
29. The Association and BPM Management intentional publishing of malicious emails and mailings of memos and newsletters with knowledge that it was false and with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not, had defamed Burns primarily for the purpose of harming Burns.
30. The Association actionable negligence, contributory negligence and the assumption of risk has harmed Burns.
31. The Association and BPM Management publications were made with knowledge that they were false and with reckless disregard of whether they were false or not.
32. The Association and BPM Management made statements knowing they were false or with reckless disregard as to their falsity. Burns injury of reputation has caused Burns to suffer socially in the community and professionally because of The Association and BPM Management intentionally malicious misinformation.
33. The Association and BPM Management continued harassment of Burns by not providing services equally without prejudice as other unit owners is illegal pursuant [4] ORS 30.260(8), unconstitutional pursuant Article I, Section 20 of the Oregon Constitution, and violates Resolution 12 of The Association Bylaws. Burns has experienced great harm and suffering as a result.
34. The Association adoption of rules and regulations designed to punish Burns in pursuance of a personal vendetta against him on the part of individual members of The Association is illegal pursuant [4] ORS 30.260(8), unconstitutional pursuant Article I, Section 20 of the Oregon Constitution, and violates Resolution 12 of The Association Bylaws. Burns has experienced great harm and suffering as a result.
35. The Association and BPM Management has singled out Burns for special treatment and has retaliated against Burns alone.
36. On October 23, 2015, The Association consisted of Chair Carol Gearin representing unit 50 owner Dick’s Ltd, Bill Cook, Barbara Madsen, Mary Washkoske and Darrel Rebmann. Carol Gearin representing Dick’s Ltd, a Richard Delphia company, later resigned and moved away the next summer in 2016 after Dick’s Ltd sold unit 50. Mary Washkoske has resigned and moved away September 2017 after selling unit 36. Bill Cook resigned leaving Barbara Madsen and Darrel Rebmann on the board of directors. Burns has suffered from grief, loss, anger, sadness and depression because of the conduct of these members of The Association and the conduct of BPM Management.
37. The Association and BPM Management have colluded to oppress and intentionally inflict maliciously great pain and suffering to Burns. As recent as October 20, 2017, Burns has been waiting since September 5, 2017 for the balcony railing of unit 28 to be painted after having been pressure washed. The contractor skipped painting the Burns balcony railing on September 13, 2017 and painted the balcony of the former board member Mary Washkoske at another building. On October 3, 2017, BPM Management emailed Burns declaring the contractor had completed their contracted work. This was in response to an email Burns had sent showing the railing still not painted. This act and many other acts are intentionally done to inflict great inconvenience, pain and suffering to Burns by The Association and BPM Management.
38. The Association and BPM Management have corrupted voting procedure by double mailing ballots in 2017 and 2018 and encouraging owners to use the proxy vote before candidates are announced. This manipulation gives BPM Management excessive control and harms candidates by favoring incumbent majority board members. All incumbent majority board members were appointed by proxy vote.
39. The Association and Burns attempted to mediate with the assistance of the Hon. Jacob Tanzer prior to the filing of a previous action. This mediation satisfied any pre-litigation alternative dispute resolution requirement contained in ORS Chapter 100.
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Defamation)
40. Burns re-alleges paragraphs 1-39 and incorporates them by reference herein.
41. The Association’s retaliation against Burns’ alone is an abuse of discretion andpower and is therefore illegal, unconstitutional and violates of The Association Bylaws.
42. When The Association issued to all of the unit owners the written board memo September 28, 2017 from board of directors president Don Jones, The Association published false and defamatory statements about Burns.
43. The Association refused to correct or retract the statements when requested by Burns.
44. In so doing, The Association libeled Burns.
45. The Association, BPM Management and board of directors presidents have continued to defame Burns by knowingly writing false information about legal proceedings with the intent to inflict severe mental and emotional distress.
46. The Association’s libel of Burns has caused him to suffer economic andnoneconomic damages to his reputation in the community and professionally.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS)
47. Burns re-alleges paragraph 1-46 and incorporates them by reference herein.
48. The Association abused its power and illegally and discriminatorily retaliated against Burns intending to inflict severe mental and emotional distress on Burns. Burns has suffered severe mental and emotional distress. As a result of The Association’ intentional infliction of emotional distress on Burns, Burns sought professional mental and medical help for symptoms of anxiety, stress and depression on April 2014 and continues to pursue relief from the same symptoms.
Punitive Damages
49. Plaintiff reserves the right to move to amend this Complaint to allege punitive damages pursuant to ORS 31.725.
Prayer For Relief
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgement against The Association as follows:1. On Plaintiffs’ First Claim for Relief, damages against The Association for defamation in the approximate amount of $10,000 with the exact amount to be determined at trial;
2. On Plaintiffs’ Second Claim for Relief from Intentional Infliction Of EmotionalDistress, damages against The Association resulting from abuse of its power andillegally and discriminatorily retaliated against Burns intending to inflict severe mental and emotional distress on Burns. Burns has suffered severe mental and emotional distress. As a result of The Association’ intentional infliction of emotional distress on Burns, Burns has suffered damages in the approximate amount of $75,000.00 in economic damages and $75,000.00 in noneconomic damages with the exact amount to be determined at trial;
3. Plaintiffs’ reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to Bylaws Article XIV, ORS 100.470, and ORS 28.100;
4. For its cost and disbursements incurred herein; and
5. Such other relief as the Court seems just and equitable.
DATED January 8, 2018._______________________________
THOMAS SCOTT BURNS, Pro Se
5180 NW Neakahnie AvenuePortland, Oregon 97229
Telephone: 503-729-8889
Email: BeingThereInTheGarden@gmail.com
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH COMPLAINT LENGTH AND TYPE SIZE REQUIREMENTS Complaint LengthI certify that this complaint complies with the word-count limitation of ORAP 5.05(2)(b)(ii) and that the word count of this complaint (as described in ORAP 5.05(2)(a)) is 2,631 words.Type sizeI certify that the size of the type in this petition is not smaller than 14 point for both the text of the complaint and footnotes as required by ORAP 5.05(4)(f)
DATED January 8, 2018._______________________________
THOMAS SCOTT BURNS, Pro Se
5180 NW Neakahnie AvenuePortland, Oregon 97229
Telephone: 503-729-8889
Email: BeingThereInTheGarden@gmail.com
CERTIFICATE OF FILING On January 8, 2018, I filed the original of this motion in person a true copy of the same via the Court’s mailing address:Washington County Circuit Court Washington County Courthouse 150 North 1st Avenue MS37Hillsboro, OR 97124
DATED January 8 2018 _______________________________
THOMAS SCOTT BURNS, Pro Se
5180 NW Neakahnie AvenuePortland, Oregon 97229
Telephone: 503-729-8889
Email: BeingThereInTheGarden@gmail.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI hereby certify that I served the foregoing document on each party whose name appears below, on the date indicated below, by mailing to him by U.S. mail a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:Country Club Condominiums C/O Michael J. Vial, Esq.Vial Fotheringham LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Road, Suite ALake Oswego, OR 97035
DATED January 8, 2018.________________________________
THOMAS SCOTT BURNS, Pro Se
John Hatch quote:
“Remember, Vial Fotheringham doesn't get paid to win cases. They get paid by getting us into lawsuits, win or lose.”
John Hatch john@hatchhomes.com wrote on 8/4/19 3:43 PM:
He (John is referring to Eric Houg) has decided that we should repay Tom Burns and another the special assessment that they have paid.
I don't base my decisions on "Depends... who are we talking about?" In fact, I emailed my same conclusion to the "another" guy back in November 2018. My conclusion then and now is that new owners don't owe the old special assessment, based on our Declaration of Unit Ownership, Section(24) MORTGAGEES, and
(2) Where the purchaser of a unit obtains title to the unit as a result of foreclosure of the first mortgage or trust deed, such purchaser, the successors and assigns of the purchaser, shall not be liable for any of the assessments against such unit or its owner which became due prior to the acquisition of title to such unit by such purchaser
Wow, that sucks, if we want to collect the special assessment from the purchaser of a foreclosure. Game over.
This would be a significant hit to the HOA
Yes, two special assessment refunds work out to about $555 per owner. The cost of losing a lawsuit on the same issue would probably double our cost to $1,110 per owner. Remember, Vial Fotheringham doesn't get paid to win cases. They get paid by getting us into a lawsuits, win or lose.
And I believe that Eric would want to do a special assessment to cover the costs.
I believe that we should raise regular HOA dues to cover our expenses. The HOA has been unable to handle special assessments. Another special assessment if implemented near future would likely come as home prices decline. The homeowners underwater in their mortgages would again abandon their homes to foreclosure. That is what caused the lingering problem we have now.
This is something that previous board members have decided NOT to do after getting advice from the management company and our attorney.
John and I argued this privately where I asked John to produce any evidence of what advice past boards got, particularly in 2009-2010. John provided nothing. Community Association Partners (CAP) provided nothing. BPM HOA Management provided nothing. AMS has provided no legal advice regarding who should pay these old special assessments. Plus their contract specifically denies that they can be relied on for legal advice. Vial Fotheringham,https://web.archive.org/web/20170411020913/https://www.yelp.com/biz/vial-fotheringham-lake-oswego , has been inconsistent in their arguments about who is liable for special assessments. In a word, legal malpractice. If it is easier to collect it from the original owner as of Sept. 1, 2009, then Vial will call it what is was, a special assessment, assessed and owed by that owner. The Vial Fotheringham run foreclosure sale of 5150 #48 in March 2014, owned by Peter Ho was an example of that. They extracted the full special assessment principal. However, if it is more convenient to collect from the second owner after Sept, 1, 2009, then Vial Fotheringham will argue the opposite, that the special assessment wasn't a special assessment, it was a serial assessment, which is only assessed and owed a little bit each month. If that were true, then John would be on the hook for the monthly special assessments that would be assessed March 2015 and after
.
Although Eric probably knows the law better than most it is outrageous that he would proceed to entertain spending our money without getting expert advice and guidance.
Fortunately, I did get expert advice, copied in the email below.
It is as if he (Eric Houg) wants to help Burns more than the home owners that he was elected to represent and protect.
I don't want to give my money away, and I have argued against Tom on his additional demands such as for his attorney fees.
I am also concerned that he is proposing to bend/change rules and conduct business in an unprofessional manner without the help of a management body to advise and help us.
I am concerned that you are posting ignorant rumors.
I may be worrying unnecessarily but I will not be able to attend the next board meeting and I want as many make sure that as many people as possible are aware enough to hold the board accountable.
Agreed.
This is another update regarding the conspiracy that has been happening at Country Club Condominiums since 2009. Those below have been proven to have conspired to commit financial fraud. Litigation continues alleging foreclosure fraud, fiduciary breach of duty, extortion, negligence and IIED against the property management company BPM Management, two accounting firms, the law firm Vial Fotheringham LLP and the board of directors of the homeowners association.
These are the Washington County Oregon cases involving Country Club Condominiums Homeowners Association:
17CV43911 trial 7 5 2018 blocked by Summary Judgement 17CV46333 trial 7 5 2018 blocked by Summary Judgement 17CV53584 trial 7 31 2018 blocked by Partial Summary Judgement C154640CV blocked by Summary Judgement
VF-Law.com Vial Fotheringham LLP headquarters is in Lake Oswego, Oregon. The
subsidiaries are in 4 other states:
Northwest HOA Law Center
17355 SW Boones Ferry Road, Suite A, Lake Oswego, OR 97035
BPM Management is a multi state property management company certified by the Community Association Managers International Certification Board CAMICB. A complaint has been filed alleging manager Susan Camarda-West coerced to commit financial fraud. The local address of BPM is 1800 SW 1st Avenue, Suite One Portland Oregon 97201.
The persons who have served as presidents of the homeowners association board of directors since 2010, resigned and all have sold their units still owing assessment interest are:
Don Jones with no forwarding address who sold and moved February 2018 owing $5,155.
William M Cook of Cook and Associates LLC 503 645 5763 and living at 91998 Lewis & Clark Rd, Astoria, OR 97103 in Clatsop County. He also sold in May 2018 owing $5,151.
Carol Gearin of Dick’s LTD that is a Mr. Richard L. Delphia company sold owing $328.15. Dick's Ltd. is an Oregon Domestic Business Corporation filed on January 22, 1992 . The company's filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is 278992-85.
Don Jones was president of the Homeowners Association prior to 2011 and again in 2016 until January 2018. He also has resigned and sold his unit leaving the current homeowners with a financial deficiency of $200,000. The current board of directors are suggested to file a claim against BPM Management and the two accounting firms involved so as to be compensated for the loss instead of forcing an assessment on the
deceived new and remaining homeowners. John Hatch who is the current board president has decided to have an assessment instead. The criminals are escaping.
This is organized crime, the perfect legitimate business and should be prosecuted under RICO. All legal remedy has and is being attempted at a huge expense. I have lost $170,000 in legal expense leaving me in poverty with $70,000 of debt. These cases are a perfect example of SLAPP law, Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. All exhibits filed provide any evidence needed to pursue criminal action. The Washington County Sheriff Department and Judicial system has been deficient and politically suspect of prejudice in the past.
I currently plan to file a case in federal court claiming I was illegally collected a construction assessment of $16,670 violating foreclosure law pursuant 2017 ORS 100.475 and the DECLARATION OF UNIT OWNERSHIP, (24) MORTGAGEES. More than $1,500 was paid by HUD prior to closing that was not subtracted from the original assessment amount of $16,670 that I was forced to pay while buying the foreclosed property.
I NEED HELP FROM THE FBI after the failure of every other means possible short of the FBI! I have been informing the FBI and survived 9 years of this form of RICO terrorism at the age of 67 next March.
Actual filing
When I purchased a HUD foreclosure in 2010, the property management company and board of directors of the Country Club Homeowners Association illegally collected a construction assessment of $16,670 violating foreclosure law pursuant 2017 ORS 100.475 and the DECLARATION OF UNIT OWNERSHIP, (24) MORTGAGEES. More than $1,500 was paid by HUD prior to closing that was not subtracted from the original assessment of $18,670 which would have lowered the balance to $15,170 at closing. I was forced to pay the full $16,670 and paid it off May 2015. Now the HOA board of directors and BPM Management Company tried to collect $3,678 of interest from me. The previous two presidents of the board, Don Jones and William Cook, sold their units February and May of 2018 owing approximately $5,150 each in interest.
This is RICO organized crime and I have lost $170,000 in legal fees fighting them and the HOA is $200,000 in debt causing another assessment to be inflicted on the current owners. There is insurance with American Family, but the the current board president John Hatch of Hatch Homes Group 503-789-1247 will not file a claim. He has hired a Vial Fotheringham LLP alumni attorney instead. Michael Vial of Vial Fotheringham has represented the board of directors and BPM Management since 2009 and has a huge conflict of interest. The firm has used SLAPP, Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, to cause undue expense to fight the conspiracy between supposed legitimate business. All my over 500 claim exhibits for my Washington County Cases 17CV43911 and 17CV46333 were blocked by Summary Judgement 10 days before a Jury Trial. I have been robbed.
I NEED HELP FROM THE FBI after the failure of every other means possible short of the FBI. I have been informing the FBI and survived for 9 years of this form of RICO Terrorism at the age of 67 in March. I lost
Cook and Associates LLC 503-645-5763, Bill was deputy commissioner of the Port Authority under now Felon X- Commissioner Peter Gearin and X-Husband of Carol Gearin.
Former HOA board president Carol Gearin and on the board of unit owner Dick's LTD that is a Mr. Richard L. Delphia company that sold their unit in 2016 still owing $328.15 of interest. Dick's LTD filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is 278992-85. The Homeowners Association is approximately $200,000 in debt with unfunded interest debt and an assessment is pending on the current owners instead of successful legal action against these persons and Susan West of BPM Management Company located at 1800 S 1st Avenue, Suite One, Portland, Oregon 97201, 503-334-2198.
There was another $200,000 of unknown expense from the 2009 Construction Assessment that was never documented nor explained sufficiently by Susan West of BPM Management nor board president Will M Cook.
Contract fraud by the vendors has persisted under the mismanagement of BPM and the board involving Charter Construction and the 4 landscape maintenance companies since 2010 that has amounted to ten of thousands of dollars each year.
William Cook, Carol Gearin and Susan West of BPM Management extorted thousands of dollars from me as false $250 vendor interference fines and SLAPP (Strategic Legal Against Public Participation) legal fees.
Abuses can originate from virtually every part of the legal system. Litigants, attorneys, law enforcement and judiciary can abuse the system, sometimes accidentally but more often intentionally. Legal abuse can also be systemic, such as when the principles, processes, and consequences of law itself encourage and enable individuals to legally harm others. Legal abuse refers to unfair or improper legal action initiated with selfish or malicious intentions. Abuse can originate from nearly any part of the legal system, including frivolous and vexatious litigants, abuses by law enforcement, incompetent, careless or corrupt attorneys and misconduct from the judiciary itself. Legal abuse is responsible not only for injustice, but also harm to physical, psychological and societal health. Abusive litigants Main articles: Vexatious litigation, Frivolous litigation, Strategic lawsuit against public participation, and Frameup Abusive litigants in civil cases are most often classified as vexatious litigation, frivolous litigation, or both. A vexatious litigant seeks to harass or subdue an adversary. A frivolous litigant starts or carries on actions that have little or no merit and are very unlikely to be won. Litigants of this sort are often unable to find representation willing to accommodate them and thus must represent themselves in propria persona. There can often be considerable overlap between these two types of abuse. One case in point is the strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), which is a lawsuit intended to censor, intimidate and silence critics by fear, intimidation and burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition. In some cases, criminals may seek to deter witnesses from pursuing restitution through the criminal justice system, or act in vengeance to those who have. Such actions are self-evidently vexatious, but are typically frivolous as well in that the plaintiff does not expect, or even intend, to win. Litigants can abuse the system in criminal ways as well. Some of the forms of criminal legal system abuse are jury tampering, the practice of directing enticements or threats to jurors in order to influence their deliberations, and falsification of evidence, which refers to any of a variety of ways evidence is improperly manipulated. One particular case of falsifying evidence is the frameup, a chiefly American term for the manufacture or manipulation of evidence for the purpose of indicating the guilt of an innocent party. One variation of this is when a criminal intimidates a witness by calling the child abuse hotline with a false report of child abuse or neglect against the witness. Law enforcement abuse Main article: Police misconduct There are a plethora of ways that police, law enforcement, and Child Protective Services investigators can undermine the rights of citizens. Sometimes such abuses are unintentional, brought about by circumstance, imperfect understanding of some subtlety of law, or other kinds of good-faith mistakes. In other cases rights are abused deliberately, due to prejudice, self-interest, vigilantism, impaired value judgment, conflicts of interest or corruption. Such police misconduct can take many forms, among them false arrest, harassment, police brutality, falsification of evidence, coercion and in rare cases, torture and false imprisonment. Abusive advocates Main article: Attorney misconduct Lawyers, paralegals and other professionals involved in legal advocacy can abuse the system in a number of ways. In some cases, representation may be well-intended but nonetheless incompetent. In others, lawyers engage in misconduct in an effort to gain unfair advantage for their clients or in pursuit of some self-interest. Abusive judiciary Main article: Judicial misconduct Abuse from the bench can arise from various causes, including incompetence, conflicts of interest, bias or prejudice, judicial misconduct and corruption.
Thank you Wikipedia!
Copyright © 2024 SLAPPandROB.Com - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
This is allegedly extortion, embezzlement, racketeering, fraud, retaliation, gross negligence, traumatizing behavior with intent to harm by communitymgt.com & puppet #HOA board of directors allegedly led by John Hatch of HatchHomes.com and attorney Michael Vial of Vial Fotheringham LLP. Alleged money laundering of legal fees initiating a probable forensic audit.